Search This Blog

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

BLOWING THOUGHT PROCESS!!!

Subject:  Interesting reply
> from CEO of J.P
>         Morgan to a Pretty Girl on an investment Forum.
> To: BLOWING THOUGHT PROCESS!!!
  A young and pretty
  lady posted this on a popular forum:
  Title: What
  I do to marry a rich guy?
  I'm going to be
  honest of what I'm going to say here. I'm
  25   this
  year.
  I'm very pretty, have style and good taste. I
  wish to marry a guy with $500k annual salary or above. You might  sa that I'm greedy, but an annual salary of $1M is considered  only as middle class in New York .         requirement is not high.  Is there anyone in this forum who has an income of $500k annual salary?
Are you all  married?
  I wanted to ask: what should I do to marry rich persons like you?
  Among those I've dated, the richest $250k annual income, and iseems that this is my upper limit. If someone is going to move int high cost residential area on the west        side of New York City, $250k annual income is not enough.  I'm here humbly to ask a few  questions:
   1) Where do most rich bachelors hang out?
         (Please list down the names  and addresses of bars,
        restaurant, gym)
  2) Which age group should I
         target?
   3) Why most wives of the riches is only
         average-looking i 've met a few girls who doesn't have  looks and are not interesting,  but they are able to marr  rich guys
  4) How do you decide who can be your wife,and who can only  be your girlfriend? (my target now is to get married)
   Ms. Pretty   Awesom reply from CEO of J.P. Morgan:
   Dear Ms Pretty,
   I have read your post with great interest Guess there are   lots of girls out there who have similar questions like yours.
  Please allow me to analyse you situation as a professional
> investor. My annual income is more than
>         $500k, which meets
>   your requirement, so I hope everyone
>         believes that I'm  not wasting
> time here. From the
>         standpoint of a business
>   person, it is a bad decision to
>         marry you. The answer is very
> simple, so let me
>         explain.
>
>   Put the details aside, what you're trying
> to
>         do is an   exchange of
> "beauty" and "money": Person A
>         provides beauty,
>   and Person B pays for it, fair and
>         square. However, there's a
> deadly problem here, your beauty will
>         fade, but my money
>   will not be gone without any good
>         reason. The fact is, my income
> might increase from year to year, but
>         you can't be prettier year
>   after year. Hence from the
>         viewpoint of economics, I am an
> appreciation asset, and you are a
>         depreciation asset. It's not just
>   normal depreciation,
>         but exponential depreciation. If that is your
> only asset, your value
>         will be much worried 10 years later.
>
>   By the terms we
>         use in Wall Street, every trading has a position,
> dating with you is
>         also a "trading position". If the trade
> value
> dropped   we
>         will sell it and it is not a good idea to keep it
> for
> long term -
>         same goes with the marriage that you wanted. It
> might be
> cruel to
>         say   this, but in order to make a wiser
> decision any
>         assets
> with great  depreciation value will be sold or
>         "leased". Anyone with
> over $500k   annual income is not a
>         fool; we would only date you, but
> will not marry  you. I
>         would advise that you forget looking for any
> clues to marry a rich
>         guy.
>
>   And by the way, you could make yourself to
>         become a rich person
> with $500k annual income. This has better chance
>         than finding a rich
> fool.
>
>   Hope this reply helps.
>         If you are interested in "leasing"
> services,
> do contact
>         me...
>
>   signed,
>
>   CEO
>   J.P.
>         Morgan
>
>
>   P/S For your information, those "ugly
>         ducklings" which you mentioned,
>   will  also
>         remain loyal and seldom "look antique",
> unlike
>         you
>   who  will go to the next higher
>         bidder.
>
>sender_Dr..Anil kulsreshth

No comments: